Letter: Nilsen on television
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: When I was asked to act as a consultant on Mike Morley's documentary Murder in Mind, I was told it would be a serious examination of the development of 'offender profiling' since my early work on the 'Railway Murders'. However, as is clear from the perceptive review by Mark Lawson ('Free speech or just cheap?', 27 January), the justifiable concern with giving Nilsen airtime in 'a chat show for psychopaths' has added to public confusion about the nature of such 'profiling'.
Interviews with offenders have played only a small part in the development of profiling research. Indeed, there are important doubts about whether such interviews could ever be central to the scientific study of criminal behaviour. If the programme fostered the view, expressed by Mark Lawson, that profiling consists of 'purely intuitive . . . guesses', then it has set public understanding back considerably.
My own contributions to police investigations are based on extensive research, published in scientific journals. Yet, although Central filmed detailed examples of this work, it was kept out of the documentary in favour of the interviews with violent, remorseless criminals.
There are many conditions under which interviews with offenders could make a valuable contribution to an effective and informative documentary, but I remain unconvinced that Mike Morley's film was one of them.
Sincerely,
DAVID CANTER
Professor of Psychology
Department of Psychology
University of Surrey
Guildford, Surrey
27 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments