Letter: New Labour and old students
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The real origins of the shake-up in political control at the National Union of Students in the early 1980s ("Student firebrands come of age", 27 January) had nothing at all to do with an ousting of the far left.
Rather, Labour's break from the Broad Left alliance arose from a perceived rightward shift, characterised in the Broad Left's development plan for NUS - away from diverse, broad-based campaigning, towards a narrower emphasis on matters of self-interest and polite lobbying.
This shift reflected the "student issues only" agenda being propounded at the time by the then drippingly wet Federation of Conservative Students.
Either Stephen Twigg and others have been hopelessly misled, or some New Labour apparatchik has decided upon a convenient re-interpretation of events. Or both.
MARK CASSIDY
Havant, Hampshire
The author was a Labour member of the NUS executive, 1980-81
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments