Letter: New curriculum's emphasis on grammar

Sir Randolph Quirk
Friday 05 February 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am dismayed to note the absurdly disproportionate emphasis on grammar in recent discussions of English teaching (reports, 3 February; leader, 4 February). Standard English is not to be defined simply as 'grammatically correct English' since this totally ignores the vocabulary, a far more significant component.

The vocabulary of standard English (as our world-class dictionaries show) is uniquely rich and finely shaded. This is where teachers can focus attention to greatest effect. Learning new words and meanings is the key to enriched experience as well as to clear and logical thinking.

Yours faithfully,

RANDOLPH QUIRK

Fellow, University College

London, WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in