Letter: Need should not be the sole criterion for gun ownership
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The firearm in British life cannot simply be dismissed as an unwelcome icon imported from America.Between 1689 and the 1930s, the people of this country had a more unfettered legal right to possess arms for their personal defence (including machine guns) than did the people of the USA.
However, it was the Volunteer movement of Victorian times, and the ideal of providing an effective base for the defence of the realm, which geared the civilian ownership of arms to target shooting for the next century.
Traditionally, the UK had no gun lobby. Civilian target shooting was well integrated with society and was as respectable as archery and fencing. Ironically, traditional civilian firearms training successfully "de-iconised" firearms in the minds of the vast majority of participants.
D EADSFORTH
Winchester, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments