Letter: Nations who get into in a state
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEAL ASCHERSON ('Words fail us as the world drifts towards disorder', 31 January) wants a rational description of the term 'nation'.
Perhaps a fruitful starting point would be to ask what a nation is not. One thing we can say for certain is that very few 'nation-states' are homogeneous nations. The United Kingdom is an example of a multinational state, just as the former Yugoslavia was. Why assume that every nation should have its own state, or, if it has a state, that it should be geographically compatible with the members of that national identity when the historical ebb and flow of populations makes this impossible - except by the horrors of 'ethnic cleansing'?
The essential issue is surely to recognise that national groupings outside their own state or in a multinational state should have their social, linguistic and cultural rights recognised and protected.
Simon Partridge
London N2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments