Letter: Nationalism and the future of the European Union

Mr A. N. Duff
Thursday 10 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: At least we now have a precise answer to the long-standing interesting question about the Government's attitude to 'widening' and 'deepening' ('Larger EU sparks argument over control', 9 March). Our ministers are prepared to enlarge the European Union only if its internal democracy is weakened.

But the Government's tactics are bizarre. Is it really that much easier to cobble together a blocking minority coalition of two big states plus one small state from a total of 12 than two big states plus two small states from a total of 16? Moreover, is it reasonable to elevate such an arithmetical proposition into a defining moment

of European history? Only in

Byzantium.

Surely it would have been wiser, as the commission suggested at the time, to have taken on board the revision of the council's qualified majority voting procedures during the negotiation of the Maastricht treaty.

For now, two consequences are likely to follow a British veto of democratic deepening in the council. First, public opinion in Scandinavia will wonder whether the EU is really worth joining at all; and, second, the European Parliament may veto the enlargement package. What a pity.

Yours sincerely,

ANDREW DUFF

Director

Federal Trust for Education

and Research

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in