Letter: National Science Week: was it empty rhetoric or a cause for celebration?

Dr Richard D. Ryder
Monday 28 March 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Lewis Wolpert is right that science is not about moral values (Letters, 24 March). But it is precisely its amorality that frightens certain people. Nuclear weapons, environmental pollution and cruelty to animals in experiments are seen as products of this scientific amorality, and it is issues such as these that give science a bad name.

Science must put its own house in order. Scientists must be seen to be on the right side in the major moral debates of our time. Only in this way will science regain the respect it deserves.

Yours faithfully,

RICHARD RYDER

Haytor, Devon

24 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in