Letter: Myth of media choice

Keith Johnson
Tuesday 10 March 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TONY HALL, Chief Executive of BBC News (letter, 4 March) bangs on about the myth of "choice". Most people don't need choice in the media.

When we had fewer television and radio channels the controller's difficult job was to provide a balanced schedule that could appeal to the widest possible audience. The lack of "choice" meant that occasionally viewers and listeners might have the enjoyable experience of being stretched by material they otherwise would never have explored.

Now with the plethora of "choice" it's easier just to pick your channel, plug in and switch off. Then we wonder why we are raising a nation of children obsessed with cartoons or sport or violence or soaps or sex.

Radio 4 was a channel you could leave on all day, knowing that you would be entertained and informed in ways you might never have imagined.

No, choice is not good: diversity is good. By removing this diversity today's broadcasters are creating a fragmented nation of monocultures.

It takes less talent to deliver the glut of politics that Mr Hall promises than it does to produce a focused programme like Yesterday in Parliament, which by invading my ears for 15 minutes each day forces me to think about issues of which I might otherwise not have been aware.

KEITH JOHNSON

Old Isleworth, Middlesex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in