Letter: Muskets and self-defence pose no threat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Andrew Marr's excellent comment ('There is a way to stop the urban gunfire', 16 March) makes the usual omission by those discussing firearms. There is a growing group of firearm-users who harbour no lethal intention towards either pheasants or policemen, but who find their activities hampered or obstructed by laws that take no account of their needs.
I am talking about battle re-enactment societies. These are well-regulated and insured groups of basically law-abiding people, yet they are often treated as if their members are planning to hold up sub-post offices armed with matchlock muskets, or disrupt flights at Heathrow with demi-culverin. Any legislation on firearms ownership and use must be formulated with this group in mind; anyone involved in planning such legislation will find a good deal of informed goodwill on our side.
Yours sincerely,
SARAH THURSFIELD
Oswestry, Shropshire
18 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments