Letter: Much thought given to selling paintings
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Contrary to the impression given in the article 'College sale of paintings challenged' (25 September), the decision by Royal Holloway and Bedford New College to sell three paintings from its collection was not made by the Charity Commissioners and is a matter for the college council. It is true that the Commission's consent was needed before a sale could be arranged.
Far from treating that matter lightly, the Commission considered it most carefully. The college was required to make out a case on legal grounds which would justify our drawing up a scheme giving the Commissioners' consent for the sale to go ahead. That case was that the expense of refurbishing and maintaining the Founder's building (a Grade I listed building of unique architectural merit) was such a drain on the college's resources that the very safety of the picture collection might be put at risk.
It is not true that no expert evidence was received. The evidence was that the three paintings are not of a piece with the remainder of the collection.
The matter was referred to the full Board of Charity Commissioners on no fewer than three occasions, and considered carefully each time.
Objectors to the scheme had two routes of appeal to the courts, either against the scheme itself or on the grounds of a breach of natural justice, but neither has been pursued. The Attorney-General, who has a separate right of appeal, has authorised me to say that he has also considered the matter with care and has decided not to appeal.
Yours faithfully,
RICHARD FRIES
Chief Charity Commissioner
Charity Commission
London, SW1
25 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments