LETTER: MPs' salaries: market forces, professional parity and job cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Robert Lyons
Sir: It is difficult to be unsympathetic to Members of Parliament who seek an improvement in pay: who does not? However, others are required to show an improvement in productivity before their aspirations can be met.
Should not MPs be faced with the same criteria? The House of Commons is clearly over-manned: we pay for 651 MPs where the US House of Representatives manages with 435. Let them be offered the simple alternative: reduce your number by one third in return for a 50 per cent increase in salary.
The House would operate more efficiently: no longer would the chamber be unable to seat the full membership for important debates; no longer would office accommodation in the Palace of Westminster be inadequate.
Yours faithfully,
Robert Lyons
London, W1
15 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments