Letter: More votes mean less for Mr Major
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Why do government ministers think it helps their beleaguered leader to keep claiming that John Major achieved a record Tory vote at the last election?
His actual score was 41.9 per cent of the total UK vote, compared with an average of 42.9 per cent for Margaret Thatcher's three victories, 46.4 per cent for Edward Heath (1970), 49.4 per cent for Harold Macmillan (1959), 49.7 per cent for Anthony Eden (1955) and 48.0 per cent for Winston Churchill (1951). We have to go back to 1922, when Stanley Baldwin won with 38.5 per cent, for a Tory victory based on a smaller share of the votes cast.
However, the actual votes cast for each party have gone up as the total electorate has increased, which enables Mr Major's supporters to say he won more votes than any predecessor. But what are they implying? Is he a mixture of a medical wonder-man and a super-dad, personally responsible for all those longer lives and extra births that have increased the number of voters, a smaller proportion of whom supported him than any other recent Tory prime minister?
Yours faithfully,
MICHAEL STEED
Canterbury
30 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments