Letter: More legislation will not help squatters

Mr Richard Lloyd
Tuesday 05 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Elaine Ives-Cameron's claim that 'thousands of home-owners are or have been' experiencing her problems in evicting squatters ('The parasites who took over my home', 21 June) and that her problems were due to insufficient criminal legislation is misleading.

The evidence suggests that squatting of privately-owned property is rare. The vast majority of squatted residential property is owned by local authorities and housing associations.

Under current criminal law, 'protected intending occupiers' and 'displaced residential occupiers' can call on police assistance in gaining vacant possession. Squatters who damage property can also be adequately dealt with by the criminal law. The civil court has unqualified discretion to hear a case against squatters at very short notice and to enforce possession immediately.

If Ms Ives-Cameron took 31 2 years to gain possession, she should be campaigning for fewer administrative delays in the civil procedure rather than stricter criminal proceedings which are, in Shelter's opinion, unnecessary and open to abuse by landlords wishing to illegally evict tenants. As the Association of Chief Police Officers has pointed out, extending the criminal law will simply place more pressure on overstretched police and court resources.

There is a need for recognition by government that most people squat because they are homeless. The goal of public policy should be to make squatting unnecessary, and make it unnecessary for owners of properties to leave them empty.

Yours faithfully,

RICHARD LLOYD

Head of Policy

Shelter

London, EC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in