Letter: Moral questions raised by Philby sale
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Nicholas Bethell's article on Kim Philby prompts me to suggest that our security services operate double standards.
While, to Lord Bethell's dismay, no steps have been taken to hinder the sale of Philby's effects for the benefit of his family, the Attorney General, Sir Nicholas Lyell, has brought an action against George Blake, another MI6 agent, to sequester the royalties of his autobiography to prevent his 'unjust enrichment' on the grounds that they are the proceeds of his breach of confidentiality as a former secret service agent.
But then Philby, like Sir Anthony Blunt, was part of the well- connected upper-class 'Establishment', while Blake is a parvenu foreigner and therefore easy game.
Yours faithfully,
BENEDICT BIRNBERG
London, SE3
7 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments