Letter: Money to pay for GPs' surgeries
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Dr AC Markus (Letters, 28 May) does not paint the full picture about fund-holding and GP surgeries.
In the remuneration system for GPs there have been provisions for more than 30 years for the state to make contributions towards the capital cost of GP surgeries. The two main schemes are known as the Cost Rent Scheme, where GPs receive what amounts to an interest-free loan to provide premises, and the Improvement Grant Scheme, where grants of between a third and two-thirds of the cost of improving surgeries are made available. Incidentally, both schemes were introduced by a progressive Labour minister of health: Kenneth Robinson. Over the past few years, under arrangements to encourage the development of GP surgeries in parts of London, grants of up to 90 per cent have been made available, usually to non-fund-holding GPs.
Money for such schemes has been short recently. Therefore we should welcome the ability of those fund-holders who make savings to redirect them to improving the premises and services that are provided for their patients, thus releasing limited resources for other capital developments.
All of these schemes have helped to develop an outstanding range of GP surgeries for fundholders, non-fund-holders and patients in many parts of the country. We should welcome this rather than resort to pointscoring.
CLIVE PARR
General Manager
National Association of Fundholding Practices
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments