Letter: Monarchy today: hereditary principle, God's will, persons and offices

Mr P. G. Suarez
Tuesday 25 October 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Hazel Wachters-Patmore's letter is not logical (20 October). In order to prove that the institution of monarchy contravenes human rights, she lists a number of things the monarch can only do if he or she is prepared to abdicate. The Archbishop of Canterbury is free to declare himself a Seventh Day Adventist and the editor of the Guardian is free to declare himself a Conservative, but both would have to resign their positions if they did.

Yours faithfully, P. G. SUAREZ London, SW10 21 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in