Letter: Modern science relies on facts to bridge racial barriers

Mr T. Rakowska
Wednesday 23 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In his attempt to elaborate on 'non-Western' science, Ziauddin Sardar misses the point. In 1537 Niccolo Tartaglia wrote his Nuova Scienza - the title became a catch- phrase to identify the work of a whole host of near contemporaries: Bacon, Harvey, Kepler, Descartes, Huyghens, Boyle, Newton, Leibniz . . . the list is almost endless in this unique, historical epoch, the key feature of which is that it was 'new'.

To miss this basic fact is to distort everything. Whether Newton appreciated the value of pre-Columbian potatoes or the work of al Haytham is insignificant in comparison to the new faith in the order of nature, which could be traced by reasoned observation to every detailed occurrence. Though we may now have serious reservations about the value of this 'faith', its most distinctive feature has been its universality, neither arbitrary nor European, deeming phrases such as 'Islamic' science or 'Indian' metaphysics to be meaningless.

Unfortunately, Mr Sardar's own 'ethnocentricity' prevents him from recognising what A. N. Whitehead discerned to be the 'one source of origin' for science, namely the Christian 'medieval insistence on the rationality of God'.

Yours sincerely,

T. RAKOWSKA

Science Department

St Leonard's Mayfield School

Mayfield, East Sussex

22 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in