Letter: Mockery of a monarchy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Very few Australians would agree with Glenister Sheil's assertion (letter, 11 May) that the Queen's role in the Australian democracy is merely a "congenial reminder of our remarkable constitutional development".
In our recent Constitutional Convention, a very substantial majority clearly rejected the present role of Her Majesty, which many think puts such emphasis on the second syllable of "democracy" that our constitution should be changed to ensure a really Australian head of state and thus to eliminate, once and for all, this mockery.
For that majority and those whom they represent, the only real issue remaining, despite the views of Sheil and his sentimental coterie of monarchists, is how an Australian head of state is to be selected and, if necessary, dismissed. They expect that to be determined before 2000.
JAMES T C BRASSIL
Frankston,
Victoria,
Australia
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments