Letter: Michael Mates's puzzling priority

Professor Bernard Crick
Thursday 01 July 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The question of the sickening decline of standards in British public life must cover both the business and the political communities, especially when for 14 years a government has preached and practised that the culture of business must be applied to the polity and public service. This is what makes the counter-attack of the last few days against the Serious Fraud Office so odd, or is it a diversionary attack that for the moment has distracted most of the media?

I once followed Northern Ireland affairs closely, going to many conferences and meetings. In the last years of Margaret Thatcher's reign Michael Mates made his presence felt, well informed, forceful, speaking as if for his party (chairman of the Conservative Northern Ireland Committee, after all), obviously eager not just for office in general, which is common enough, but to be a Northern Ireland minister, an unusual and honourable ambition which many have sought to avoid or been given as Greek gift or poisoned chalice.

Any MP gets scores of letters each week about 'injustice by the authorities' and hard-done-by stories, often from the poor and humble - as well as the mentally disturbed. From all these scores, what on earth possessed Mr Mates to take up that one from a constituent who was Asil Nadir's agent, and to push this case with a force that endangered, then destroyed, his ambitions to continue to serve Northern Ireland as a minister of the Crown? A strange priority. How can anyone with common sense believe that this was just bad judgement? It was a resignation statement too like the Kerryman's definition of a net, 'string surrounded by holes'.

Yours sincerely,

BERNARD CRICK

Edinburgh

1 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in