LETTER: Merton's offers to Mabel Nash
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I WAS alarmed by your article on Mabel Nash, which was written without an approach to Merton Council ("Mabel a victim of stingy council", 22 October).
Merton assessed Mrs Nash in August when we were providing home care every morning, daytime and evening of the week.
Mrs Nash expressed a preference for a residential home that charges more than the council normally pays. The family were willing to pay the difference but Mrs Nash was unsure about entering residential care. We were unable to keep the vacancy open and this opportunity was lost.
Mrs Nash entered hospital in September following a fall and wanted more time to decide whether to enter residential care. She decided that she definitely wanted residential care on 10 October.
Mrs Nash refused a place in Sutton and asked for another home which costs pounds 320 per week. It was left with the family to decide whether they wished to pay the additional top-up fee. Merton was prepared to pay pounds 285, pounds 50 more than the standard.
However, Mrs Nash again decided against residential care and her family have now requested 24-hour home care, which we are currently discussing.
Contrary to your story, Sutton has a limit of pounds 220 while Kingston negotiates individual limits for residential care.
Tony Colman
Leader of Merton Council
Morden, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments