Letter: Medical negligence: to apologise, to explain, to litigate
Your support helps us to tell the story
In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.
Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.
Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives
Kelly Rissman
US News Reporter
From Mr Michael Napier
Sir: The tranquilliser claims Polly Toynbee refers to were against pharmaceutical companies for failing to warn doctors and patients about the risk of injury to health, caused by addiction and dependency on drugs, at vast expense to the NHS. Soon after the claims were made, a government warning led to a dramatic reduction in tranquilliser prescriptions at a huge saving to the NHS. And although the liability of the drug manufacturers was never tested at trial, the case was certainly not the no-hoper she suggests.
In her sweeping attack on the legal profession's motives when acting for accident victims, Polly Toynbee also overlooks the fact that nobody can sue for medical negligence (with or without legal aid) unless their claim is supported by the independent evidence of another doctor.
Medical negligence litigation is usually hard fought and not every case succeeds. But each year, numerous victims of medical accidents rightly recover compensation that in total far exceeds the annual amount paid out by legal aid on cases that fail.
Yours faithfully,
Michael Napier
President, Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Nottingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments