Letter: Master plan for the Festival Hall

Terry Farrell
Friday 22 August 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was the master planner for the South Bank for six years and support the proposals to replan this urban quarter, as it really needs it. My plans incorporated a lightweight enclosure to the Queen Elizabeth Hall and Hayward Gallery and Lord Rogers' scheme follows this thinking and has many other very positive aspects.

However, I always planned to involve other architects to create diversity and, in particular, hated and wished to undo the "mega" architecture of the original LCC scheme that wrapped the Festival Hall, and indeed the whole site, in octopus tentacles of the same concrete design.

Like Professor Robert Maxwell (Letters, 13 August), I am therefore concerned that Lord Rogers' scheme may well, in the end, be perceived as doing the same thing, ie enveloping the site in one kind of architecture, wrapping the Festival Hall in the same glass canopies as the main Queen Elizabeth Hall and Hayward Gallery enclosures.

Not only could this suppress a huge area in one architectural expression, with a loss of diversity, urban richness and variety, it could also be quite overwhelming for the Festival Hall which ought to sit (in the tradition of Thames-side "palaces") on its own territory, commanding its own entrances.

TERRY FARRELL

London W9

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in