Letter: Martian microbe in the soup
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: N C Wickramasinghe (letter, 20 August) claims that the discovery of microbial forms in the Arctic Martian meteorite vindicates panspermia, and rules out the Earth-centred primordial soup.
With respect to him, this is not so. In chapter 15 of Carl Sagan and Iosef Shmuelovich Shklovskii's work Intelligent Life in the Universe, the essential difficulty for the panspermia hypothesis is identified. If the pressure of sunlight on a biological particle is sufficient to exceed the force of gravity and drive the particle away from its own star, it will drive it away from any similar star, and hence the particle may never come to rest in a compatible environment.
This difficulty does not apply to a particle travelling the relatively short distance from the Earth to Mars. The particles in the meteorite are therefore most easily explained as the descendants of particles thrown from the Earth's own primordial atmosphere and in consequence as being the earliest known record of pollution.
Belief in the uniqueness of life on Earth flies in the face of all the speculative reasoning of 20th century science. However, the meteorite adds nothing to that speculation, and those who doubt can still, without shame, await proof.
R G WILLIAMS
Lindfield, Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments