Sir: Peter Prior (letter, 9 December) suggests that in 50 years' time sterling will be "bobbing helplessly in the waves made by the super- currencies". As one who has yet to make my mind up about the "noble" reasons for joining a federal Europe, I find the argument that there is a need for the UK to be part of a super Euro-currency unconvincing.
The volatile nature of the currency markets will always mean there is a case for strong "smaller" currencies to enable investors to minimise risk. With London already the currency exchange capital of Europe I would suggest that the financial systems to enable sterling to remain outside the EMU, whilst maintaining authority, already exist.
Dr EDMUND HUGHES
Dublin
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments