Letter:Managing the coastline retreat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I note with interest your report (31 July) on coastal erosion. There are two associated issues which need highlighting.
Firstly, whilst recognising that sea defence strategies must take account of the forces of nature, it is still essential that we use resources and expertise in the most effective way. At present responsibilities are hopelessly fragmented.
In Norfolk, three district councils, the Environment Agency, internal drainage boards and the Broads Authority, all have a role in defending the land against the sea. This sort of pattern is repeated in counties right round our coastline.
I am sure that the Government should re-examine responsibilities for sea defences and flooding to ensure that available expertise and resources are pooled and deployed in the most effective way. Second, there is great anxiety locally that offshore dredging may be having an adverse effect on our natural sea defences.
The system for the granting of licences for dredging should be modernised and made more transparent. For example, in any licensing system it must surely be right that the fee paid by the licensee is in the public domain. Yet the Crown Estate refuses to reveal this information. It is not enough to reveal total income from licences granted, transparency with regard to all financial details would reassure the public.
NORMAN LAMB
North Norfolk Liberal Democrat
Parliamentary Spokesman
Norwich
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments