LETTER:Making sense of sentencing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Stephen Shaw
Sir: Criticism of Michael Howard's sentencing proposals ("Senior Tories attack Howard's jail plans", 5 February) has thus far concentrated on his idea of mandatory penalties for repeat offenders. The other half of the policy - in effect abolishing parole to introduce what the Americans call "truth in sentencing" - is equally dangerous. If implemented, the policy would mean chaos for the Prison Service, both because of a huge rise in prisoner numbers and because the prospect of early release is a powerful incentive for prisoners to behave well.
Mr Howard has taken to mocking the sentencing framework as "half-time sentences for full-time crimes". In fact, all sentences of 12 months or more represent a period of custody, plus supervision, plus liability to serve the remainder of the sentence in prison in the event of reoffending. Every part of the sentence has some meaning.
These arrangements are based on strong research evidence that imprisonment followed by supervision is more likely to reduce reoffending than unconditional release after "full-time" imprisonment. Mr Howard's plans threaten to increase crime, not reduce it.
Yours faithfully,
Stephen Shaw
Director
Prison Reform Trust
London, EC1
5 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments