Letter: Make quangos accountable

Anna Killick
Saturday 10 August 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Geoffrey Lean makes a strong case for setting up a food safety agency ("BSE: a scandal that won't go away", 4 August). But we also need to ensure that government advisers are truly independent.

Policy formulation in this country, regardless of its subject matter, is deeply influenced by unaccountable private interests. This is most notable when examining the work of quangos, such as the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee, which are as secretive and clubby as Whitehall itself. Ministers and civil servants select their members. They are often dominated by representatives of the industries making or profiting from the products under scrutiny. They meet in secret, do not disclose evidence, and advise ministers secretly. It is time these advisory bodies were independent, open and accountable.

To achieve this we need a framework of public law. This could take inspiration from the US "Sunshine Acts" that were passed post-war. This legislation was designed to guarantee the independence of membership of advisory bodies, prevent their "capture" by private interests and establish a public right of access to their meetings and their information through a Freedom of Information Act. Such a framework could provide the necessary level of accountability to ensure the state acts in our best interests.

Anna Killick

Charter 88, London EC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in