Letter: Maastricht: innovative debate, multi-speed Europe and rebels' power

Mr Ernest Wistrich
Thursday 29 October 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Jonathan Eyal is quite right to criticise the European Community's current policies towards the central and east European countries ('Kind words, cruel policies', 27 October). The restrictive association agreements with Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland should be replaced by a free trade area in which all goods, including agricultural products, could be freely exported by them to the EC, as recommended by the president of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. But even this change would not provide those countries with any clear goal or direction to help them to maintain political and social stability as they tackle the immensely difficult task of transforming themselves into successful market economies.

A firm perspective of full EC membership within a reasonable time-scale is essential if they are to retain political support for the economic reforms needed to join. Some claim that this could take 10 to 20 years. But even if this were so, there is no reason why full political membership could not be promised before the end of this decade, subject to appropriately lengthy transitional periods for economic adjustment after they join.

All new entrants into the EC, including the UK, enjoyed transitional arrangements after entry, and the nature and length of these has varied from country to country. Furthermore the Maastricht treaty already implies a multi-speed Europe in its progress towards a single currency. As Mr Eyal rightly claims, the stability of the whole of Europe, including its eastern part, depends on both the deepening of the EC into a full union and enlarging it at the same time.

Yours faithfully,

ERNEST WISTRICH

London, NW3

27 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in