Letter: Loss of TV archive programmes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Whilst the wiping of Not Only ... But Also may be undesirable ("BBC recorded local news over classic Pete 'n' Dud", 21 August), it uses questionable logic to reach the conclusion that news coverage which replaced it is of lesser value.
News items are often unique, and totally irreplaceable: Dud and Pete at least have had a selection of their output preserved, and scripts are surely available for other material.
Furthermore, the fact that clearances from the archive concentrated on light entertainment and drama, leaving news coverage behind, owes much to the short-sighted behaviour by the likes of Equity on behalf of their artists. The union limited repeats of older material in favour of new productions.
Once overseas sales had been exhausted by the BBC, and with little chance of it being re-screened, much material became unusable and archiving a drain on the licence payer's money. Utilising the space for news makes commercial sense under the circumstances.
Had Equity undertaken to finance the archiving of the material in conjunction with the BBC, older programmes might still have been with us yet.
Only the unforeseen development of domestic-video revealed that this material had further commercial exploitation potential, by which time it was too late.
SIMON DOYLE
London NW3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments