Letter: Living without free furniture
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was dismayed by Roy Hattersley's demand for increased financial help for the unemployed ("Labour's mission is power, not the poor", 30 July) and particularly by the two examples he used.
I earn pounds 720 net per month for a 40-hour week. From this I pay pounds 250 mortgage costs and pounds 52 council tax. This leaves me pounds 420 per month to support my wife (non earning) and two children. This is far less than the "just over pounds 500 after housing costs and council tax" received by the unemployed family of two adults and two children. In addition I pay pounds 48 each month on train fares to work.
Like the second example, when I first purchased my shell of a house I had no money for furniture and for two years my wife and baby son slept on the floor until I had saved enough money for a bed. No politicians urged that we be given free furniture as Roy Hattersley does for the non working. I voted for New Labour because I resented large chunks of my meagre wages being taken in taxes by the previous government and given to those too lazy to work for a living.
Incidentally, unlike the sample family we never go short of food - perhaps this family do so because they choose to spend their benefit money on less important things.
ROBIN BASAK
Hitchin, Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments