Letter: Little to be gained from a federation of English-speaking states

Sir Fred Catherwood
Tuesday 11 April 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The reason why Professor Anatole Beck's romantic notion of a federation of English-speaking states will not happen (letter, 11 April) is that the keystone state, the US, does not want it. They believe that it is in their interests that, as one of their best friends, we should be a leading member of the new and powerful European Union. The Australians and Canadians go along with that view. The last thing they want is a weak Britain hanging on to their coat-tails.

After the second de Gaulle veto on our membership of the EEC, and when I was director general of the National Economic Development Council (NEDC), I had extensive talks with leading people in all three countries - and with the Danes - to see whether we could form a North Atlantic free trade area; and the answers were brisk and to the point.

For 10 years, until last year, I was a member of the European Parliament's Delegation to the US Congress, a unique group, meeting with our House colleagues for two weekends a year and also, once a year, meeting separately with members of the administration and the Senate. There is no question that that is still their view. As one great power, they recognise another, now much bigger than they are, and want to deal with it directly. They want us not just as a part of it but a leading part.

Yours sincerely,

FRED CATHERWOOD

Balsham, Cambridge

11 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in