Letter: Literary tapes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: David Zeffman's little joke about the 'Dianagate' tapes not being protected by copyright, as they would not pass the required test of 'literary merit', may be amusing (letter, 2 September), but he is wrong. 'Sound recordings' are protected by copyright and the definitions include 'a recording of sounds, from which the sounds may be reproduced' and 'a recording of . . . a literary . . . work, from which sounds reproducing (it) may be produced'.
The first of these covers taped telephone conversations, but even the second definition could apply to such conversations, as the test is not whether the material has literary merit, but merely whether or not it is a literary work.
Luckily for many authors, literary style or merit is of no relevance in law to deciding whether material is a 'literary work', otherwise an enormous number of 'literary works' would have no copyright protection at all.
Yours faithfully,
MICHAEL D. VARCOE-COCKS
London, W6
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments