Letter: Literary heritage: where lessons in Milton could lead
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You suggest that 'the first question that arises is: why Milton?' (leading article, 12 December). I have taught Milton to A- level students and I am now involved in publishing his works for the educational market.
Nevertheless, for me the first question is: why (John) Marenbon? This is not to question the importance of what Dr Marenbon is saying or his academic credentials, but rather to wonder that you didn't find space among your comments on English literature in our schools to question the danger of allowing politically appointed individuals to prescribe specific authors for our schools. We should all know where that leads.
Such prescriptions might be more understandable (although no less dangerous) if there were evidence that English teachers were hell-bent on destroying the literary heritage you refer to. In fact, the evidence usually adduced on these occasions is that fledgling undergraduates haven't read exactly the same books as their lecturers-to-be. I find this flimsy evidence, especially when I think of all those English teachers of my acquaintance who spend their days trying to build up an active love of English literature.
I'm all for Milton, although I might argue more strongly for Homer or Isaiah if we are talking of heritage. But whoever is to be studied, let us leave it to the teachers. Surely university lecturers would expect no less freedom when designing courses for their students?
Yours faithfully,
KEITH ROSE
Cambridge
14 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments