Letter: Life without water
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: When a water supply is disconnected, the residents in the house are unable to wash, flush the toilet, prepare food or ensure the house is clean. Within a very short space of time, conditions become intolerable.
Janet Langdon (Letters, 4 February) claims that water companies can distinguish between customers who 'won't pay' and those who can't. In the circumstances this is remarkable. What is less remarkable is that customers find the money to ensure reconnection; they may go without food, they may not pay the rent, the children may go without new shoes, or they may borrow from friends or, worse, from loan sharks.
The water companies cannot possibly make judgements about the source of payment in cases of disconnection. Water is a basic public health need and all disconnections should be banned.
Yours faithfully,
PETER ARCHER
Chair
Housing Committee
Institution of Environmental
Health Officers
London, SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments