Letter: Licensed cyclists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In response to J. V. Gough's letter (5 April), there are no objections in principle to requiring cyclists to have third-party insurance - many do already, with the encouragement of the Cyclists' Touring Club. There are also communities in Canada where cycles carry licence plates.
The difficulty lies in the collection of charges. If a road fund licence were to be charged pro rata by weight with a motor vehicle, it would cost about 25p a year, far less than the cost of collection.
There can be no excuse for lack of consideration among road users of any kind. However, for the sake of perspective, it should be borne in mind that the misuse of motor vehicles kills 15 people on British roads every day. The injuries and apprehension caused by even the most idiotic cyclist hardly ever entail even a sticking-plaster, let alone loss of life.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID LEIGHTON
Newbury, Berkshire
5 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments