LETTER: Let shareholders fix directors' pay justice in self-awarded salaries
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Why are shareholders of public utilities unable to control the pay of their senior executives? Because directors fix their own pay. There is a conflict of interest, over which shareholders have no direct control.
It can be done differently. In Australia, the economist Shann Turnbull has successfully introduced "Corporate Senates", which give shareholders a veto over some directors' decisions. Like Cadbury Remuneration Committees, they can therefore control pay. But Turnbull's Senates are elected with one vote per shareholder. This means that shareholders can act as owners as well as investors.
We could thus be spared the unedifying spectacle of Messrs Wallis, Vallance and Brown defending their pay to the media without justifying it to their shareholders.
We remain, Sir, yours etc, GEORGE FREEMAN PATRICK GREEN London, SW7
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments