Letter: Lessons for Northern Ireland in Somalia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In estimating the duration of the American military presence in Somalia, we may be too ready to envisage an entrapment like Vietnam. In Vietnam, the Americans fought an orthodox war against a recognised enemy of full national status; and when the Vietnamese proved too powerful for them, the Americans negotiated for peace and went away. The whole procedure took them 10 or 12 years to complete.
So are we to expect a similar commitment to Somalia? I think not. The Somalian situation finds a closer precedent in Northern Ireland. British troops were sent there for good humanitarian reasons - on a temporary basis, of course - but unfortunately they have been compelled to fight an enemy whose military status and credentials we query, and with whom we have expressed our determination never to negotiate. Thus our troops, unavoidably, have been in Ulster for 23 years and may well be there for 30 more.
So is this the kind of prospect that faces the Americans in Somalia? No: the Ulster precedent is equally irrelevant. First, the American troops are authorised to cooperate politically with chosen specimens of the Somalian warlords, a pragmatic policy that has often been crowned with success in the past, a policy that unfortunately is unacceptable to us in Northern Ireland. Second, the Americans - properly and legally speaking - have as a nation no committed status binding them to Somalia. If they want out, all they need to do is withdraw their contingent from the interventionist expedition currently organised by the United Nations.
Might there not be something in this American idea of sending in a (genuinely) temporary peace- making force, to prepare the way for a follow-up peace-keeping force? The American troops moving into Somalia, 28,000 strong, form a close numerical counterpart to the security forces we have so long maintained in Northern Ireland. Where could we find a peace-keeping force to take over from us there?
It looks as though we may shortly come under pressure from President-elect Clinton on just this issue. We should welcome his advice, still more his participation.
Yours faithfully,
ANDREW GILCHRIST
Hazelbank, Strathclyde
12 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments