Letter: Lenient sentencing policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Lenient sentencing policy
A PAEDOPHILE guilty of murder has been released from prison having served only nine years of a 16-year sentence (report, 6 April). Why has the criminal justice system allowed, or even as a matter of policy planned for, this to happen?
The principle of early release appears to run contrary to natural justice. Sentences imposed by judges should convey certainty, to prisoners, victims and the public, that they mean what they say. Rather than cutting prison sentences for any reason, including good behaviour, sentences should certainly run the full term and even be increased for bad behaviour. How else can we, the public, have any faith in the system?
As it is, many of us suspect that the system does not meet our desire for, even our right to, justice. Certainly, in the case of homicide, our lives seem to be valued too cheaply in current sentencing policy.
DENYS WHATMORE
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments