Letter: Legal system can be a minefield
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Anyone is entitled to conduct his own case, criminal or civil, before any court in the land. There are, however, obvious reasons why litigants tend to instruct lawyers to represent them (despite Angela Lambert's opinion of my profession voiced in 'Me v Him: legal, decent and free', 17 May).
First, they seek advice on the legal merits of their case - which arguments to promote and rely upon, which to bury. Then there is evidence to be obtained, sifted, honed. They may wish their case presented with maximum articulacy by someone who has not suffered sleepless nights beforehand (though sometimes we do, too). Not all litigants are professional communicators such as Ms Lambert, nor are many capable of steering objectively their best course through an emotional haze.
As to the drain on the public purse, I fear that where Ms Lambert writes fresh from her personal forensic triumph, the Lord Chancellor and his accountants may follow all too swiftly behind. People with ordinary incomes are no longer eligible for civil Legal Aid, and remuneration for lawyers serving those that are is being substantially curtailed. The Chancellor will now be gratified to hear that lawyers who prepare and present cases at public expense can be replaced at a stroke by some self-help training sessions.
Yours faithfully,
HUGH D. SULLIVAN
London, W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments