Letter: Legal measures to protect SSSIs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Not only is there inadequate legal protection for Sites of Special Scientific Interest (Letters, 10 August), but the environmental damage to these areas caused by road-building schemes does not even enter into the formal cost- benefit analysis undertaken by the Department of Transport. Worse still, the costs incurred in the compulsory purchase of such land are typically relatively small.
Had a proposed route instead threatened a shopping complex or a golf course the enormous compensation involved would probably have led to its rejection in favour of a 'cheaper' alternative. Within the economic constraints currently imposed, it is no wonder that land of the highest environmental value is continually
threatened.
European Community policies offer some encouragement (in spite of the recent decision over Twyford Down). The Birds Directive and more recently the Habitats Directive allow for the designation of Special Protection Areas which will then enjoy additional legal protection. This may help to give environmental considerations their proper place in the planning process.
We are currently fighting to save Hindhead Common and the Devil's Punchbowl (an SSSI, a proposed SPA, and an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) from 'improvements' to the A3 London-Portsmouth road. In what may become one of the first British tests of the new EC directives, it remains to be seen whether these new powers will give environmentally valuable sites the protection that they
deserve.
Yours faithfully,
PETER DONNELLY
Hindhead,
Surrey
10 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments