Letter: Legal doubts about sanctions on Iraq
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Last Wednesday's 'Diary' commented on the meeting planned for that evening by our Commission of Inquiry to discuss both the effect and the legality of the sanctions on Iraq. Your columnist implied that our meeting was, in fact, designed less to uphold international law than to give covert support to the present government in Baghdad.
Had your reporters followed up this piece of 'journalism' by doing some retrospective investigation in the evening, they would have found that, while every conceivable political view was represented at this well-attended and moving meeting of 200 people, overwhelmingly the main impulse of the participants was to make a point of steering well clear of any contentious political issues one way or the other, so as to highlight the humanitarian and legal questions involved in the continuing economic blockade.
Iraq is inhabited not only by its president, but by 18 million people who, in systematic contravention of Article 54 of the 1977 Geneva Protocols, are being subjected to hunger as a means of war, are being deprived of essential medical supplies and are facing the destruction of services essential to civilian life.
Your international pages have themselves commented on numerous occasions that these sanctions are failing to further the declared aims of Western policy, and doubts have frequently been raised there as to their legality.
If you keep the writers of your 'Diary' column too busy to attend the meetings on which they report, could you at least please provide them with enough time to read your own international pages?
Yours faithfully,
HUGH STEPHENS
Co-ordinator
British Commission of Inquiry
for the International War Crimes
Tribunal
London, WC1
11 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments