Letter: Legacy of care for the old
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee (8 April) complains that John Major "promises new schemes to allow the old to keep their property instead of spending it on care if they have to go into nursing homes". She believes that personal wealth should be used to pay for care rather than burden taxes, and I am inclined to agree.
Further, this sits ill with John Major's other expressed wish - to get rid of inheritance tax. This would make inheritance a lottery. Those who died without needing long-term care would be able to pass on all their wealth, but those who spent a long time in care would leave nothing beyond pounds 10,000.
Would it not be better to have an effective inheritance tax and use it to pay (or part pay) for care of those who need it? A society in which inheritance becomes more and more significant risks increasing the already highly damaging wealth differences in the country.
G W Alderton
Helsby Cheshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments