Letter: Leave it till the baby is born

Ms Christine Gowdridge
Sunday 05 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I do hope that father of four David Hunt, better known as the Secretary of State for Employment, read and digested Jackie Cowhig's article on 'late' births ('When baby isn't in a hurry', 31 May). He is responsible for the new legislation that will give employed women expecting a baby after 16 October 1994 the right to 14 weeks' maternity leave. Women can start their leave from 11 weeks before the baby is due. Women whose babies 'aren't in a hurry' will lose out badly under the new scheme as they will have to return to work almost immediately after the baby is born. That's not good for mothers, babies or employers, as any parent knows.

It would be much fairer and, as your article has shown, better reflect the reality of pregnancy and childbirth if all women were allowed up to 29 weeks' leave after the birth to run from when the baby is actually born, as the existing system provides for employees with more than two years' service. The majority of pregnant working women already qualify and so this extension would cost very little and be of enormous benefit to both mothers and their babies.

Yours sincerely,

CHRISTINE GOWDRIDGE

Director

The Maternity Alliance

London, WC1

1 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in