LETTER : Language purity and pedantry

Wednesday 14 February 1996 00:02 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Christopher Bamber

Sir: I wonder if Barney Prendergast (letter, 12 February) would regard Sir Ernest Gowers as a "trendy" defender of the "slipshod"?

Over 30 years ago Gowers' revision of Fowler's Modern English Usage (the only edition I have, and I make no apology for that) stated:

"That (different) can only be followed by from and not by to is a SUPERSTITION" [original emphases].

Pedantry should not always be condemned; but Mr Prendergast should make sure that his is more securely based.

Yours faithfully,

Christopher Bamber

Betley, Staffordshire

12 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

LETTER : Language purity and pedantry

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering