Letter: Landlords' benefit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Mike Bolton ('Caught in the benefits trap'; Letters, 24 August) is wrong to believe that by only paying 'market rents' councils avoid benefiting landlords being paid sky-high rents.
This is not true, when the shortage of suitable housing for people on housing benefit is considered. This has allowed the market values for rents to increase substantially. The system therefore does result in taxpayers forking out large sums in housing benefit to pay for sky-high rents to landlords (even at 'market values').
I also find it sad that the argument for council-owned housing as a solution to this problem has hardly featured in this debate.
Yours faithfully
RAYMOND ALLEN
Oxford
24 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments