Letter: Lamont: a tale of contradictions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his personal statement in the Commons yesterday ('Lamont fuels Tory doubts over Major's leadership', 10 June), Norman Lamont said that 'this recession has its origins in the boom of 1988 and 1989', making it 'inevitable'.
Later he boasted that, in his second Budget, 'the 20p income tax band helped us to win the election', and claimed credit for an unpopular third Budget. Then we learnt he does not believe that 'even the
timing of interest-rate changes should ever be affected by political considerations'.
As a layman, I'd welcome an article by Mr Lamont explaining precisely why interest-rate policy should be immune from political considerations, when - apparently - any other instrument of economic policy is fair game, with special reference to his behaviour as Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Yours faithfully,
COLIN BARTLETT
Bournemouth,
Dorset
10 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments