Letter: Lack of chemistry between students and science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article (20 August) comments that 'science is still the poor relation' when compared to arts, social sciences and technology subjects.
Your reasons concentrate on the poor prospects for earnings and the low priority given to research and development in industry. You add that many students may feel (rightly or wrongly) that 'it is easier to get good grades in arts subjects'. But you omit one key point. The structure of the 'new' GCSE science syllabus is itself partly at fault since it attempts to combine a range of science subjects. With this in mind, many students may reject science at A-level because they feel less equipped to deal with individual science subjects at A-level.
Yours faithfully,
WENDY P. ARTHUR
London, W6
20 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments