Letter: Labour's benefit cut
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The events of Wednesday evening in Parliament represent once again the imposition by the Treasury of dominance over Parliamentary government. From within Whitehall I watched this happen to the Wilson and Heath governments.
The philosophy of the British Treasury, founded on the accounting principles of a Victorian parish council, has remained unchanged for over a century. They seek to control all public finance and dominate the political agenda. They hate all public expenditure, but particularly transfer payments - persons, social security and welfare.
They persuade each succeeding government that sound public finance consists in restricting public expenditure. They insist on exerting control throughout Whitehall and local government. They will not permit any hypothecation, they hate giving up any tax. They insist on controlling all borrowing.
And the irony is that the Treasury has been consistently unsuccessful in its economic policy. We have prospered in spite of them. No other advanced country gives such powers to the national book-keepers.
I, like many, thought that this government would be strong enough to send the Treasury mandarins packing and create a sensible Ministry of Finance. The first signs were encouraging, with the Bank of England given responsibility for monetary policy. But could not last. Wednesday evening was their reply.
RICHARD GRAHAM
London SW6
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments