Letter: Labour crusade to raise standards in schools

The Earl Russell
Thursday 07 December 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Is it a coincidence that Labour's plans to "improve education" by bashing teachers are announced on the same day on which, by failing to vote against the Budget tax cuts, that party has abandoned the hope of improving education by more conventional means? Like the Conservatives, Labour will need many whipping boys to carry the blame for the consequences of its own failure to spend money.

Neither Labour nor the Conservatives seem to understand that governments cannot improve education for the same reason they cannot improve our cricket: they cannot do the job themselves. They can only spend money to provide the facilities to enable our teachers or our cricketers to do the job themselves. They cannot force teachers to teach according to any professional conscience but their own. To believe otherwise is like believing that coaching can turn Devon Malcolm into a world-class spinner.

If there is anything wrong with a profession's culture, the members of the profession will change it much faster if they do not have to spend all their time asserting against the state their right to have a professional judgement of their own.

More generally, do these proposals mark the point at which Labour has been made redundant? For those who do not believe in the present policies, the Liberal Democrats offer the only alternative. For those who do believe in present policies, are the Conservatives, with a commitment tempered by experience, preferable to a Labour Party that would follow them with all the unwary zeal of a convert?

Yours sincerely,

Russell

House of Lords

London, SW1

6 December

The writer is Liberal Democrat social security spokesman in the House of Lords.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in