Letter: Kuwait's choice of a tank for the desert
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read with some sadness in the Independent diary this morning that the British people are disappointed and even bitter that my country, Kuwait, did not purchase the British Challenger 2 tank, but the American Abrams M1A2.
I was angry, too, because Kuwaitis love the British and hope to return the favours shown in 1990.
But I think we should stop and think: should Kuwait acquire weapons which, though powerful, are not entirely suitable for the desert terrain? Shall we make the same mistake in having an unprepared army? After all, we have
the same neighbour: Saddam Hussein.
I would remind you that British companies have received excellent contracts for the rebuilding of the Kuwaiti infrastructure. And I would like to say to my friend the diarist that the British mistake was to build a tank that, in accord with the British character, would not run fast enough.
Yours faithfully,
ANAS AL-SALEH
Oxford
13 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments